Feeling like a fraud in different areas of life? After 40 years of identity confusion, I discovered authenticity means embracing contradictions, not choosing sides. Finally you can stop apologizing for being whole.
“Who did your design work?”
I’ve lost count of how many times clients, colleagues, and fellow business owners have asked me this question about our websites, marketing materials, and creative projects.
“I did.”
“No, I mean who did the creative work? The visual design?”
“That was me too.”
Long pause. Confused look.
“But… you also did all the technical development? And the strategy? The same person?”
Like it was physically impossible for one brain to hold analytical thinking and artistic vision at the same time.
I’ve been getting this reaction my entire adult life. And honestly? I used to feel apologetic about it.
Here’s what usually happens next: Someone will finally accept that yes, I really can do both the creative AND the technical work. Their response? “Wow, you’re so special. You’re just gifted that way.”
And I’ll admit it—my ego loves hearing that.
But here’s what I’ve learned after decades of feeling like a fraud in multiple worlds: it’s complete bullshit.
No one is really that skewed toward just one side or the other. Sure, there are extremes, and some people are genuinely terrified of exploring the “other” side of themselves. But most of us are way more whole-brained than we’ve been convinced we are.
The reason people think I’m “special” isn’t because I have some rare combination of skills. It’s because we’ve all bought into this fiction that you have to pick a lane and stay in it.
I’m not the exception. I’m just someone who refused to choose.
Where This All Started
This whole “pick a side” thing has been following me since college.
Picture this: 18-year-old me, an artist my whole life, walking into advanced calculus classes surrounded by people who spoke fluent equation and thought in pure logic.
“What’s someone like you doing here?” my inner critic whispered during every math lecture.
Then I’d head to art studios and hear a different version of the same doubt: “What’s someone like you doing here?” when classmates discovered my major was Mathematics.
The voices in my head were absolutely relentless:
Art voice: “Real artists don’t think about money or logistics. If you can solve a math problem, you’re not a true creative. You’re a sellout.”
Business voice: “Serious professionals don’t make decisions based on what ‘feels right.’ If you’re drawing pictures during strategy sessions, you’re not analytical enough.”
I bought into the cultural myth that said I had to choose. That being good at both analytical thinking and creative expression somehow made me a fraud in both worlds.
So for decades, I tried to pick a side. I’d emphasize my Statistics degree in corporate settings and downplay it when showing my paintings. In art circles, I was the weird one with the math background, nodding along when people talked about “pure creativity” while secretly thinking about project timelines. In business meetings, I was doodling in the margins and suggesting we approach problems more “intuitively.”
The exhausting thing about living split in half? You never get to be fully yourself anywhere.
Plot Twist: The Pattern Never Stopped
Just when I thought I’d figured out the whole identity thing, at 60 I discovered another fake box I’d been living in.
Here’s the ridiculous part: I’ve been athletic my entire life. Track and basketball in junior high. Crew team and soccer in college. But somehow I’d convinced myself I was a “soft artist type.”
It makes zero logical sense. But it was absolutely true in my mind.
At 60, I was still grumbling about “gym rats” and told myself I was definitely not that type of person. I did Pilates and yoga—refined, gentle movement for refined, gentle people like me. Not that hardcore, skull-and-crossbones stuff.
There’s this local gym on our island called Black Flag. Every time I drove past, I’d literally snub my nose at their logo and think, “How ridiculous. Those people are everything I’m not.”
The Identity Earthquake
When I turned 60, my rational brain decided I needed to start lifting weights for bone density and muscle mass. My identity brain was having none of it.
I found a local personal trainer with a home garage gym. He was exactly what I hated about gym culture—arrogant, bulked up, all about chemical-laden protein shakes and intimidating his clients into submission.
After one intro meeting, I knew there was no way I was working with someone like that for that much money.
That frustration forced me to keep looking—and to reconsider my position on Black Flag.
So I walked into the place I’d been judging for years, expecting to confirm all my biases about what “those people” were like.
The owner was the nicest guy ever. Not bulked up—actually kind of lean, but obviously all muscle. He was completely accepting of my goals and made me feel welcome immediately.
And here’s what shattered my assumptions completely: Black Flag’s primary demographic is over 50, particularly women. Many are my age or older.
Zero Ken dolls grunting at their reflections or Barbie wannabes taking selfies between sets. Just normal humans with laugh lines and the occasional gray root, quietly getting stronger while the rest of the world assumes we’re home knitting.
The cherry on top: it’s basically a garage with the door rolled up to the marsh breeze. And as if the universe wanted to make absolutely sure I knew I’d found my people, there were dogs. Three of them—two giant Schnauzers and a Blue Heeler mix—just casually hanging out like this was the most normal thing in the world.
Any place where dogs feel that comfortable is my kind of place.
When Everything I “Knew” About Myself Collapsed (Again)
I started training three times a week.
Surprise! I LOVED it.
I loved seeing what my 60-year-old body could do. I loved getting stronger and more mobile instead of accepting “feeble and weak” as inevitable aging. I loved it so much I bumped up to five days a week.
Now I’m actually proud when I walk in there. All of us “old folks” busting it out, being stronger than many people I know who are decades younger than we are.
I may not look like a gym rat—I’ve still got that layer of post-menopausal padding that seems to have taken permanent residence around my middle. But if you put a finger on my arm, you’ll feel how rock solid I am underneath.
The soft artist type who judged gym culture now works out five days a week at Black Flag and convinced her husband to join her for duo training sessions.
Same person. Same values. Same love of beauty and authenticity. Just a completely different story about what was possible for someone “like me.”
[If you’re ready to question more stories about what’s possible for someone “like you,” join my email list: The Freeflow Rebellion.]
The Pattern I’ve Been Living My Whole Life
Standing in that gym at 60, lifting weights I never thought I’d touch, surrounded by badass women my age who were redefining what “over 50” looks like, I finally saw it clearly:
I’d been living my entire life in artificial categories that had nothing to do with who I actually am.
- Artist OR logical thinker (why not both?)
- Creative OR practical (my entire 25-year business proves this is ridiculous)
- Soft OR strong (as if sensitivity and physical strength were opposites)
- Refined OR hardcore (as if you can’t love both yoga and deadlifts)
- Young person’s activity OR age-appropriate behavior (says who?)
Every single identity box I’d accepted was complete fiction.
The same pattern, playing out across decades. In college, I tortured myself trying to choose between math and art. In my career, I exhausted myself code-switching between “creative Pamela” and “analytical Pamela.” At 60, I was still limiting myself based on stories about what “people like me” do or don’t do.
The most exhausting thing about trying to be just one thing? You never get to be fully yourself anywhere.
What Changed Everything
Here’s what hit me in that moment of recognition: I’d been treating myself like a character in someone else’s story instead of the author of my own.
For over forty years, I’d been asking “What type of person am I?” when the real question was “What do I actually want to explore?”
I’d been seeking permission from imaginary gatekeepers—the Art Police, the Business Police, the Age-Appropriate Behavior Police—who literally don’t exist.
The categories that felt so real, so permanent, so obviously true? They were just stories I’d inherited and never thought to question.
Sound familiar? This is exactly the kind of invisible rule-breaking I write about in The Freeflow Rebellion. Most of the limitations we accept aren’t real—they’re just stories we’ve agreed to live by without realizing we had a choice.
Your Permission Slip (Because You Don’t Actually Need One)
Here’s what I wish someone had told me at 18: You’re not a noun. You’re a verb.
You’re not a fixed identity that has to stay consistent with past versions of yourself. You’re an evolving, expanding, constantly surprising human being who gets to keep becoming.
You can be a vegan at breakfast and eat meat at lunch if that’s what feels right for your body today.
You can be logical AND intuitive, soft AND strong, refined AND hardcore.
You can be a 60-year-old woman who lifts heavy weights five days a week, even if you spent decades thinking that wasn’t “your type.”
You can change your mind about who you are without apologizing to anyone—including the voice in your head that insists you have to “pick a lane.”
The Questions That Will Set You Free
Instead of asking “What type of person am I?” try asking:
- What would I explore if I didn’t have to stay consistent with old versions of myself?
- What two sides of myself have I been told can’t coexist?
- What would I try if I stopped worrying about whether it fits my “brand”?
- Where am I living smaller than necessary because of identity stories that aren’t even mine?
- What assumptions am I making about people “like me” that might be complete fiction?
Why Your Contradictions Matter
After four decades of trying to stuff myself into single-identity boxes, here’s what I know:
Your contradictions are features, not bugs.
Your ability to be multiple things simultaneously isn’t confusion—it’s wholeness.
The world already has plenty of people playing it safe within artificial categories. What the world needs is you—all of you—showing up as the beautifully complex, constantly evolving, impossible-to-categorize human you actually are.
You’re allowed to be both. You’re allowed to change. You’re allowed to surprise yourself and everyone who thinks they know what you’re about.
You’re allowed to be the math major who paints abstracts, the soft-hearted person who lifts heavy weights, the business strategist who makes decisions with intuition.
You’re allowed to stop trying to be just one thing.
Because the truth is, you never were just one thing anyway. You were always whole. You were always allowed to use all of yourself.
You just forgot for a while.
What’s Next?
I’d love to hear from you: What identity box are you ready to outgrow? What categories have you been trying to fit into that don’t actually serve who you’re becoming?
Drop me a line and tell me about your own beautiful contradictions. I promise to read every single response—hearing your stories is one of my favorite parts of this work.
Ready to question more invisible rules about who you’re “supposed” to be? Join The Freeflow Rebellion for weekly insights about authentic living and gentle invitations to more freedom. Because the most radical thing you can do is remember you were always allowed to be your whole self.
Check out my art galleries to see what happens when someone stops asking “what should this look like?” and starts trusting what wants to emerge.






